<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who should worry about Xilinx and Oasys partnership?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/</link>
	<description>My take on tech --and other topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-4085</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-4085</guid>
		<description>Interview with Besouw up at http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/other/4206103/Interview--Paul-van-Besouw--Oasys-Design-Systems

Q: It has been reported that Xilinx is an investor in Oasys? Is either Xilinx or Juniper an investor in Oasys? Are any of the executives of either firm an investor in Oasys?

Juniper and Xilinx are customers and not investors. Neither has taken an equity stake in Oasys. None of the executives at Juniper or Xilinx is an investor in Oasys.

Juniper licensed our RealTime Designer software to use in its design flow. Xilinx licensed the Oasys Chip Synthesis technology and is modifying it to support FPGA designs; it will have the Xilinx brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview with Besouw up at <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/other/4206103/Interview--Paul-van-Besouw--Oasys-Design-Systems" rel="nofollow">http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-blogs/other/4206103/Interview&#8211;Paul-van-Besouw&#8211;Oasys-Design-Systems</a></p>
<p>Q: It has been reported that Xilinx is an investor in Oasys? Is either Xilinx or Juniper an investor in Oasys? Are any of the executives of either firm an investor in Oasys?</p>
<p>Juniper and Xilinx are customers and not investors. Neither has taken an equity stake in Oasys. None of the executives at Juniper or Xilinx is an investor in Oasys.</p>
<p>Juniper licensed our RealTime Designer software to use in its design flow. Xilinx licensed the Oasys Chip Synthesis technology and is modifying it to support FPGA designs; it will have the Xilinx brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-3166</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>Paul van Besouw Oasys has categorically denied an investment by Xilinx, Juniper, or Renesas in an interview I will publish this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul van Besouw Oasys has categorically denied an investment by Xilinx, Juniper, or Renesas in an interview I will publish this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the other announced clients, Juniper and Renesas, are also investors. It would put a different complexion on those relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the other announced clients, Juniper and Renesas, are also investors. It would put a different complexion on those relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Coudert</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Coudert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>Xilinx invested in Oasys, according to a Xilinx source. And Xilinx has been experimenting with Oasys&#039; synthesis technology for at least a year, according to another Xilinx (R&amp;D) source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xilinx invested in Oasys, according to a Xilinx source. And Xilinx has been experimenting with Oasys&#8217; synthesis technology for at least a year, according to another Xilinx (R&amp;D) source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your source on Xilinx investing in Oasys a year or more ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your source on Xilinx investing in Oasys a year or more ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Dare</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Dare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>Obviously, the Big 3 EDA firms&#039; value-added solutions have been put on notice.  Synthesis is close enough to the core business of Xilinx (selling silicon) that they chose to make a strategic investment rather than have Oasys as yet another BYOB partner (see: Xilinx ESL Initiative).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the Big 3 EDA firms&#8217; value-added solutions have been put on notice.  Synthesis is close enough to the core business of Xilinx (selling silicon) that they chose to make a strategic investment rather than have Oasys as yet another BYOB partner (see: Xilinx ESL Initiative).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Who should worry about Xilinx and Oasys partnership? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/2010/06/11/who-should-worry-about-xilinx-and-oasys-partnership/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Who should worry about Xilinx and Oasys partnership? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ocoudert.com/blog/?p=796#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Olivier Coudert, Olivier Coudert. Olivier Coudert said: New post RT @ocoudert Who should worry about Xilinx and Oasys partnership? http://bit.ly/bSgpjb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Olivier Coudert, Olivier Coudert. Olivier Coudert said: New post RT @ocoudert Who should worry about Xilinx and Oasys partnership? <a href="http://bit.ly/bSgpjb" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bSgpjb</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

